In class, we discussed whether or not it would be worse to
live a life painless but without joy or to have a life of pain and joy. I understand that it cliché and overused to
say things such as “Oh well, the lowest of lowest makes you appreciate the
highest of highs”; I do not believe that at all. When I am in a bad place in my life, I never
stop and think “wow, this really makes me appreciate all the good in my life!” The way I would tackle this issue would be by
taking a view that Aristotle may have as well.
If you ask yourself why you do anything at all in your life, you would
eventually come to the conclusion that happiness is the ultimate motive of
human existence. Now, keeping that in
mind, let’s go back to the Epicureans.
They believe that pleasure is the result of life without pain. But that is not pleasure at all. That is just not having pain. Living a painless life does not mean that you
are happy. That is why I would prefer to
have a life with the ups and downs rather than a life without pain but with no
joy. As a human being, I strive every day
to make myself happy. Whether or not
that is selfish does not matter. It is
in my very nature to pursue Eudaimonia.
Having said this, for me and most other human beings, we believe that
even though pain is terrible and not desired, we are willing to endure it for
the sake of reaching our happiness that demands pain to accompany it. That is why we are so willing to fall in
love, make friendships, or do anything that has any level of risk. We are willing to make these sacrifices to
continue our pursuit to our ultimate goal: which is happiness.
I completely 100% agree with you on this issue. I agree with your statement, "Living a painless life does not mean that you are happy." I feel as though living a life without pain is not a life lived. It would be so boring and not worth living. However, living a life with some pain is okay if in the end it leads to happiness.
ReplyDelete